Trip

In my case I had to disable Memcached - cache to make it work. Greets, Trip

Well as far as I could test the better solution would be to create 2 additional countries. 1 Europe witht iso code EU Zone Europe currency € 2 Asia Pacific iso code AS Zone Oceania currency whatever maybe US$ but do not enable the countries so they are not visible for the customers. But enable them under prefs/geolocation as allowed countries. That seems to work as far as I can tell. Greetz, Trip

Well I guess the best way would be to show a message like "You are looged in. Please close the window and reload the shop website". You can write a sentence like that just under the javascript code in paypal_login_token.php Greetz, Trip

Yes, so far it seems to work but will wait for the first customers to make a payment to collect some real live experience

Hi Peky, the line $shipping_cost = (float)Tools::ps_round((float)$shipping_cost, 2); is still the same so if your code really elimintes the problem this would be really great and if you have the time you can add it to github here https://github.com/PrestaShop/PrestaShop/blob/1.6/classes/Cart.php so other people can benefit from that in the future. I will try it asap. Thank you, Trip

It is not working in my 1.6.11. Anyone have tested the new version which is said that so many rounding issues are fixed. The bug is old and still annoying. Atm I have one customer per day where a payment error is thrown. The skrill module runs flawless so there must be a solution.

Any solution so far?

I think the problem still exists and is really annoying. I've added a couple of new currencies and with moneybookers module there is no problem but paypal module has lots of issues with rouded currencies. Does anyone have a solution? Thx in advance, Trip

@sootski ... you have a link to your backend in the post. I would change that. @202ecommerce. thank you. Problem in my case was I had to accept the statistic thing before I could change the settings. All the best, Trip

Same problem here. Did you find the solution? Greetz, Trip

Hi El Patron, I am slightly in Holliday Mode at the moment. I think I made a couple of feature requests and I am not sure if hreflang was one or not What I can say at the moment is, I am testing it with en-au to target australian customers as I have very few visitors there. Might be interesting how this evolves over a couple of months. After one week google has only indexed a handfull of urls (at least thats what gwt tells me) so I am curious how this will go on. I guess it will take a couple of months to see some results but at least I will be able to tell if this approach might be a cheaper alternative to the ccTLD Domain approach. All the best, Trip

Well atm I can't draw a connection between Panda update and dc. What I wanted to point out is that adding unusefull information to metas is a way to reduce the gwt warnings but really does not enhance the qualtiy of a site and I am quite positive google bot understands common website patterns may it be blogs or ecommerce websites or whatever. Googles focus is imo to provide best search results for the users hence not to penalize websites because they forgot page numbers in the title and metas of paginated pages. I believe google values "quality signals" like rich snippets, extra markup etc.pp. but two quotes from the horses mouth: and last but not least: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.de/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html Best regards, Trip

Yes maybe, I am quite positive as mentioned in the article " Do nothing. Paginated content is very common, and Google does a good job returning the most relevant results to users, regardless of whether content is divided into multiple pages. " so I would wonder google does not "understand" the URL pattern and you get an penalty or whatever. It will not hurt when you use the extra markup. It's a little late now here and I haven't dived into the topic to much. I think duplicate content is much overrated. When you get a couple of warnings in wmt for a couple of pages with same meta descriptions so what? There is nothing against optimizing and I could reduce thousands of these warnings on my prodcut pages just by adding the product reference code in the metas. Does this give extra value for the customer? No. Did the warnings disappear? Yes. Do I rank better? Not sure All the best, Trip

Sorry, maybe the new rel="next" and rel="prev" is what might tackle the problem?https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1663744?hl=en Regards, Trip

When you use CCC Caching options under performance tab it changes a lot of facts. You also have the option to Move JavaScript to the end of the site so most of your points are not true at least when you know how to configure the software. Best regards, Trip