| Severity: | Minor |
| Version: | V1.1 (1.1.0.5) |
| Installation type: | Full (with sample data) |
| Theme: | Default |
| Project: | Front Office |
| Reporter: | kink |
| Report #: | 1155 |
| Date created: | 02 Jan 2009 at 14:06 (UTC+1) |
| Related to Report #: |
| Hosting service: | Ovh |
| Server OS: | Linux |
| Web server: | Apache 1.3 or later |
| PHP version: | PHP 5.0 or later 5.2.6 |
| MySQL: | 5.0 |
| Client computer OS: | Windows |
| Web browser(s) tested: | Firefox 3 |
fixed for next release !
By Lucas Cherifi on 06 Jan 2009 at 14:16 (UTC+1)
new products should be sorted by last product added, not alphabetical way
By jolvil on 06 Jan 2009 at 15:33 (UTC+1)
It doesn’t work!!!
By lehangart on 26 Jan 2009 at 17:53 (UTC+1)
Ok, there is the new correction:
The original file was good:
# line 8:
----- Original and GOOD one -----
$nbProducts = intval(Product::getNewProducts(intval($cookie->id_lang), NULL,NULL, true));
----------
but in classes/Products.php, getNewProducts was not good |line 903
----- Original -----
if ($count)
{
$result = Db::getInstance()->getRow(’
SELECT COUNT(`id_product`) AS nb
FROM `’._DB_PREFIX_.’product`
WHERE `active` = 1’);
return intval($result[’nb’]);
}
----------
----- must be: -----
if ($count)
{
$result = Db::getInstance()->getRow(’
SELECT COUNT(`id_product`) AS nb
FROM `’._DB_PREFIX_.’product`
WHERE `active` = 1
AND DATEDIFF(`date_add`, DATE_SUB(NOW(), INTERVAL ‘.(Validate::isUnsignedInt(Configuration::get(’PS_NB_DAYS_NEW_PRODUCT’)) ? Configuration::get(’PS_NB_DAYS_NEW_PRODUCT’) : 20).’ DAY)) > 0’);
return intval($result[’nb’]);
}
Because original count return the number of products on database instead of the number of new products.
Thank’s for your report lehangart!
By kink on 30 Jan 2009 at 18:01 (UTC+1)
be carrefull whith the ’ when you copy these lines
By kink on 30 Jan 2009 at 18:22 (UTC+1)
voir http://www.prestashop.com/forums/viewthread/11394/installation_configuration_et_mise_a_jour/retour_sur_le_bug_de_pagination/
By kink on 30 Jan 2009 at 18:25 (UTC+1)
Pagination bug in prices-drop.php
Details:
On prices-drop.php page. Pagination block don’t show the good number of page.
If there is 3 products-drop and 60 products in the database, 3 products are displayed (that good) but there is a link for each page (1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6)
By Русторг.биз on 23 Nov 2009 at 15:07 (UTC+1)
view link http://www.1.rustorg.biz/prices-drop.php
By Русторг.биз on 23 Nov 2009 at 15:09 (UTC+1)
For /prices-drop.php I propose this :
if ($count)
{
$sql = ‘
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT p.`id_product`) AS nb
FROM `’._DB_PREFIX_.’product` p
WHERE p.`active` = 1
AND p.`id_product` IN (
SELECT cp.`id_product`
FROM `’._DB_PREFIX_.’category_group` cg
LEFT JOIN `’._DB_PREFIX_.’category_product` cp ON (cp.`id_category` = cg.`id_category`)
WHERE cg.`id_group` ‘.(!$cookie->id_customer ? ‘= 1’ : ‘IN (SELECT id_group FROM ‘._DB_PREFIX_.’customer_group WHERE id_customer = ‘.intval($cookie->id_customer).’)’).’
)’;
$result = Db::getInstance()->getRow($sql);
return intval($result[’nb’]);
}
by :
if ($count)
{
$sql = ‘
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT p.`id_product`) AS nb
FROM `’._DB_PREFIX_.’product` p
WHERE p.`active` = 1
AND (`reduction_price` > 0 OR `reduction_percent` > 0)
‘.((!$beginning AND !$ending) ?
‘AND (`reduction_from` = `reduction_to` OR (`reduction_from` <= \’’.pSQL($currentDate).’\’ AND `reduction_to` >= \’’.pSQL($currentDate).’\’))’
:
($beginning ? ‘AND `reduction_from` <= \’’.pSQL($beginning).’\’’ : ‘’).($ending ? ‘AND `reduction_to` >= \’’.pSQL($ending).’\’’ : ‘’)).’
AND p.`id_product` IN (
SELECT cp.`id_product`
FROM `’._DB_PREFIX_.’category_group` cg
LEFT JOIN `’._DB_PREFIX_.’category_product` cp ON (cp.`id_category` = cg.`id_category`)
WHERE cg.`id_group` ‘.(!$cookie->id_customer ? ‘= 1’ : ‘IN (SELECT id_group FROM ‘._DB_PREFIX_.’customer_group WHERE id_customer = ‘.intval($cookie->id_customer).’)’).’
)’;
$result = Db::getInstance()->getRow($sql);
return intval($result[’nb’]);
}
By pppplus on 15 Dec 2009 at 00:49 (UTC+1)
Help! The mentioned option for the pagination error doesn’t work for me. :( I use version: 1.1.0.5 and can’t really compare with the file in version 1.2.5 as it doesn’t look like it at all. :(
By Mr.E. on 18 Dec 2009 at 15:57 (UTC+1)
